Strategies for Promoting Ethical Decision Making in Health Care Essay

Strategies for Promoting Ethical Decision Making in Health Care Organizations - Essay ExampleMoral sensitivity and ethical aware(predicate)ness raises sensitivity to the exposit of the situation, case, or scenario, and promotes the professional to raise questions in order to justify the right and good, just and fair, respect for singular human dignity, benefits, and burdens. It signifies that ethical purpose making a complex process with multiple angles with mainly sociable implications that tends to analyze factors such as ethical principles, social and interactional aspects, and situational and contextual factors. It is important to remain aware that all these factors need to be considered while making a decision in clinical practice. fetching the example of the issue of autonomic right to die, this is common issue in clinical practice, peculiarly in the critical care nursing practice. However, practically the issues surrounding death and dying is no lifelong simple for its legal implications and technological advances that can sustain life for unimaginable duration of time. In these situations, the nurses font dilemma for allocating resources to these patients, and this often enters into the decision making process. The patients wishes and concerns of the family also impact decisions. For nurses, these ethical situations become more significant due to invariable conflicts between professional duties and obligations and ethical responsibilities. This means the nurses are faced with the conflicts between the transaction to meet the needs of the patients and the obligations to follow hospital policy in that particular issue, implying they are obligated to comply with doctors orders and legal implications of various interventions and patient-related actions even though the ethical principles do not permit them. In the catamenia scenario, the critical ethical principles will be examined in a critical manner based on this preamble and evidence for curr ent policies would be sought as it is relevant to practice and clinical decision making (Vanlaere, L. and Gastmans, C., 2007).Case This is the story of a 67-year-old man, who lost control of his vehicle and had struck a safety rail in a single-vehicle collision. He was not wearing a seatbelt and was ejected through the windshield and sustained bad traumatic closed head and chest injuries. He was brought to the trauma center via helicopter and was admitted to the neurological intense care unit. The staff provided support to the patient as per medical advice, and he was receiving mechanical internal respiration and was unresponsive. patently he was surrounded by multiple invasive catheters and equipment. The trauma team briefly met the patients daughter who was the wholly family present, soon after the admission, and they explained the grave prognosis of her father to her. This patients care was complex, and the nurse preceptor along with a junior postgraduate nurse was administ ering the care. The investigations revealed that the patient had severe internal hemorrhage in the brain and in the chest, and some trauma to the heart could not be ruled out. The patient was on mechanical ventilation through intubation, was in deep coma, was nil orally until the consciousness was restored. The other parameters that were being monitored did not extract any sign of improvement, and the patient could not be stabilized to the required degree so as to be able to perform